While affirmative action may have different connotations as a matter of politics, as a matter of law, its meaning is more circumscribed. at 1195-96. To the extent that Congress expressed a specific intent germane to the district court's interpretation, Congress, if anything, expressed an aversion to quotas as a method to enforce Title IX. supra; Heuer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. at 12. at 2112 (the equal protection guarantee protect[s] persons, not groups), the only way to determine whether the rights of an individual athlete have been violated and what relief is necessary to remedy the violation is to engage in an explicitly gender-conscious comparison. Brown states that it seeks to address the issue of proportionality while minimizing additional undue stress on already strained physical and fiscal resources. Id. 184, 116 L.Ed.2d 145 (1991)). Brown argues that the district court's interpretation of the three-part test requires numerical proportionality, thus imposing a gender-based quota scheme in contravention of the statute. If the athletes competing in sports for which the university is permitted to field single-sex teams are excluded from the calculation of participation rates, the proportion of women participants would increase dramatically and prong one might be satisfied. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 901. Since the applicable regulation, 34 C.F.R. I leave it entirely to Brown's discretion to decide how it will balance its program to provide equal opportunities for its men and women athletes. Home. Regardless of how many steps are involved, the fact remains that the test requires proportionate participation opportunities for both sexes (prong one) unless one sex is simply not interested in participating (prong three). Any studies or surveys they might conduct in order to assess their own compliance would, in the event of litigation, be deemed irrelevant. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. We agree with the district court that Brown's proposed plan fell short of a good faith effort to meet the requirements of Title IX as explicated by this court in Cohen II and as applied by the district court on remand. Based on an analysis of membership in varsity teams, the district court concluded that there existed a disparity between female participation in intercollegiate athletics and female student enrollment. Id. Nor do the regulations require institutions to field gender-integrated teams:However, where a recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of the other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited, members of the excluded sex must be allowed to try-out for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport.Id.Whether or not the institution maintains gender-segregated teams, it must provide gender-blind equality of opportunity to its student body. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 896. Further, inappropriately relying on Frontiero, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 106.41(b). This is a class action lawsuit charging Brown University, its president, and its athletic director (collectively "Brown") with violating Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. at 1848. In light of the above, Brown argues that prong three is in fact ambiguous with respect to whether fully means (1) an institution must meet 100% of the underrepresented gender's unmet reasonable interest and ability, or (2) an institution must meet the underrepresented gender's unmet reasonable interest and ability as fully as it meets those of the overrepresented gender. Accordingly, we deem the argument waived. First, notwithstanding Brown's persistent invocation of the inflammatory terms affirmative action, preference, and quota, this is not an affirmative action case. We have also recognized that this exception may apply in those rare situations where newly emergent authority, although not directly controlling, nevertheless offers a convincing reason for believing that the earlier panel, in light of the neoteric developments, would change its course. Id. Second, Adarand does not even discuss gender discrimination, and its holding is limited to explicitly race-based classifications. In its discussion, the Court stated that, in order to prevail in a gender case, the State must show at least that the challenged classification serves important governmental objectives and that the discriminatory means employed are substantially related to the achievement of those objectives. Id. The law of the case doctrine is akin to the doctrines of collateral estoppel, res judicata, and stare decisis, Joan Steinman, Law Of The Case: A Judicial Puzzle In Consolidated And Transferred Cases And In MultiDistrict Litigation, 135 U.Penn.L.Rev. Under intermediate scrutiny, the burden of demonstrating an exceedingly persuasive justification for a government-imposed, gender-conscious classification is met by showing that the classification serves important governmental objectives, and that the means employed are substantially related to the achievement of those objectives. 2816, 2830-31, 125 L.Ed.2d 511 (1993)). We reject Brown's kitchen-sink characterization of the Policy Interpretation and its challenge to the substantial deference accorded that document by the district court. at 190. Id. Cohen I - Plaintiffs asked for a preliminary injunction that would require Brown to fund the women's teams and refrain from further reductions in direct funding for women's teams until the case could be heard. at 1917-18 (directing that Title IX must be accorded a sweep as broad as its language). Title IX provides that [n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. 20 U.S.C.A. 92-2483 1028, 1038, 117 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992). at 204 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). It is clear, nevertheless, that Brown's proposal to cut men's teams is a permissible means of effectuating compliance with the statute. In computing these figures, the district court counted as participants in intercollegiate athletics for purposes of Title IX analysis those athletes who were members of varsity teams for the majority of the last complete season. Opinion for Amy Cohen v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888 Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. For example, the district court found that some schools are reluctant to include donor-funded teams in their varsity schedules3 and that donor-funded teams are unable to obtain varsity-level coaching, recruits, and funds for travel, equipment, and post-season competition. Specifically, with respect to Title IX's guarantee that no person shall be excluded on the basis of sex from participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, 20 U.S.C. In reviewing equal protection challenges to such plans, the Court is concerned that government bodies are reaching out to implement race- or gender-conscious remedial measures that are ageless in their reach into the past, and timeless in their ability to affect the future, Wygant, 476 U.S. at 276, 106 S.Ct. at 12. Here, Brown argues that its challenge is to the decision of the district court. denied, 510 U.S. 1043, 114 S.Ct. In concluding that the district court's interpretation and application of the three-part test creates a quota, Brown errs, in part, because it fails to recognize that (i) the substantial proportionality test of prong one is only the starting point, and not the conclusion, of the analysis; and (ii) prong three is not implicated unless a gender-based disparity with respect to athletics participation opportunities has been shown to exist. at 2724 (holding that Title VII does not prohibit private employers from voluntarily implementing race-conscious measures to eliminate manifest racial imbalances in traditionally segregated job categories); McDaniel v. Barresi, 402 U.S. 39, 41, 91 S.Ct. 3331, 3336-37, 73 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1982); Califano v. Webster, 430 U.S. 313, 317, 97 S.Ct. Brown sought to introduce the NCAA Gender Equity Study and the results of an undergraduate poll on student interest in athletics, but was not permitted to do so. 2264, 2274, 2277, 135 L.Ed.2d 735 (1996) (viewing Virginia's benign justification for a gender classification skeptically); Shuford v. Alabama State Bd. at 2275-exceedingly persuasive justification in light of section 1681(b)'s no quota provision. 1681-1688 (1988) ("Title IX"). Instead, the law requires that, absent a demonstration of continuing program expansion for the underrepresented gender under prong two of the three-part test, an institution must either provide athletics opportunities in proportion to the gender composition of the student body so as to satisfy prong one, or fully accommodate the interests and abilities of athletes of the underrepresented gender under prong three. No aspect of the Title IX regime at issue in this case-inclusive of the statute, the relevant regulation, and the pertinent agency documents-mandates gender-based preferences or quotas, or specific timetables for implementing numerical goals. This is a class action lawsuit charging Brown University, its President, and its Athletic Director (collectively "defendants" or "Brown") with discriminating against women in the operation of its intercollegiate athletic program, in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. To accomplish these objectives, Congress directed all agencies extending financial assistance to educational institutions to develop procedures for terminating financial assistance to institutions that violate Title IX. Each prong of the Policy Interpretation's three-part test determines compliance in this manner. Athletic Ass'n, 43 F.3d 265 (6th Cir.1994); Kelley v. Board of Trustees, 35 F.3d 265 (7th Cir.1994), cert. Under the new standards established in those cases, Cohen II is flawed both because it applies a lenient version of intermediate scrutiny that is impermissible following Adarand and because it did not apply the exceedingly persuasive justification test of Virginia. We reject both premises.17 Brown's implicit reliance on Adarand as contrary intervening controlling authority that warrants a departure from the law of the case doctrine is misplaced because, while Adarand does make new law, the law it makes is wholly irrelevant to the disposition of this appeal, and, even if Adarand did apply, it does not mandate the level of scrutiny to be applied to gender-conscious government action. Cohen v. Brown University. Id. [W]here an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, [we] construe the statute to avoid such problems unless such construction is plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Bldg. Under these circumstances, the district court's finding that there are interested women able to compete at the university-funded varsity level, Cohen III, 879 F.Supp. at ----, 116 S.Ct. See Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 902 (citing Lipsett v. University of P.R., 864 F.2d 881, 897 (1st Cir.1988)); but see Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995) (Title VII sexual harassment standards applied to Title IX sexual harassment case in non-employment context), cert. Prior to the trial on the merits that gave rise to this appeal, the district court granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification and denied defendants' motion to dismiss. To adopt the relative interests approach would be, not only to overrule Cohen II, but to rewrite the enforcing agency's interpretation of its own regulation so as to incorporate an entirely different standard for Title IX compliance. Second, Brown's plan artificially boosts women's varsity numbers by adding junior varsity positions on four women's teams. Id. at 1193-94. [W]hereas Title VII is largely peremptory, Title IX is largely aspirational, and thus, a loosely laced buskin. Id. In 2018, the defendant established a . Athletics are part of that curriculum. Brown simply ignores the fact that it is required to accommodate fully the interests and abilities of the underrepresented gender, not because the three-part test mandates preferential treatment for women ab initio, but because Brown has been found (under prong one) to have allocated its athletics participation opportunities so as to create a significant gender-based disparity with respect to these opportunities, and has failed (under prong two) to show a history and continuing practice of expansion of opportunities for the underrepresented gender. The methods of determining interest and ability do not disadvantage the members of an underrepresented sex;c.The methods of determining ability take into account team performance records; andd. The first prong is met if the school provides participation opportunities for male and female students in numbers substantially proportionate to their enrollments. 1053, 94 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987) (upholding a one-black-for-one-white promotion requirement ordered by a district court as an interim measure in response to proven discrimination by a state employer); Local 28 ofSheet Metal Workers v. EEOC, 478 U.S. 421, 106 S.Ct. and Tel. See Horner v. Kentucky High Sch. The law of the case doctrine is a prudential rule of policy and practice, rather than an absolute bar to reconsideration [] or a limitation on a federal court's power. Rivera-Martinez, 931 F.2d at 150-51. This action was taken to ensure that the Order was final for purposes of this court's jurisdiction, and to expedite the appeal process. Id. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in institutions benefitting from federal funds. Therefore, we still have the problem that to fully accommodate the interests of the underrepresented sex may be impossible under the district court's interpretation. 1681, et seq. Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 903. 9. Id. Of the university-funded teams, 12 were men's teams and 13 were women's teams; of the donor-funded teams, three were women's teams and four were men's teams. Injury is 37%. The regulation at 34 C.F.R. 24. (1993) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf) or read online for free. Amy Cohen (plaintiff), a member of the . for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718, 723-24, and n. 9, 102 S.Ct. Appellees also argue that, to the extent that the equal protection claim is viable, Brown lacks standing to raise it. a Title IX plaintiff in an athletic discrimination suit must accompany statistical evidence of disparate impact with some further evidence of discrimination . See Metro Broadcasting, 497 U.S. at 564, 110 S.Ct. at 1771. Although we decline Brown's invitation to find that the district court's remedy was an abuse of discretion, we do find that the district court erred in substituting its own specific relief in place of Brown's statutorily permissible proposal to comply with Title IX by cutting men's teams until substantial proportionality was achieved. In Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), the Supreme Court established that the government generally cannot criminalize the display of profane words in public places.. Cohen charged with beaching peace for wearing profane jacket. It is clearly in the best interest of both the male and the female athletes to have an increase in women's opportunities and a small decrease in men's opportunities, if necessary, rather than, as under Brown's plan, no increase in women's opportunities and a large decrease in men's opportunities. In the first appeal, a panel of this court elucidated the applicable legal framework, upholding the substance of the district court's interpretation and application of the law in granting plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction,1 and rejecting essentially the same legal arguments Brown makes here. at 71,417.The 1990 version of the Title IX Athletics Investigator's Manual, an internal agency document, instructs investigating officials to consider, inter alia, the following: (i) any institutional surveys or assessments of students' athletics interests and abilities, see Valerie M. Bonnette & Lamar Daniel, Department of Education, Title IX Athletics Investigator's Manual at 22 (1990); (ii) the expressed interests of the underrepresented gender, id. at 205-06, 99 S.Ct. We therefore affirm in all respects the district court's analysis and rulings on the issue of liability. This appeal followed. at 2274, which requires that [p]arties who seek to defend gender-based government action must demonstrate an exceedingly persuasive justification for that action, id. Id. This standard may be practical for certain sports that require large teams, but what of individual sports? 1681-1688, provides that no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. of Cal. at 190. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings. 26. Third, even if Adarand did apply, it does not dictate the level of scrutiny to be applied in this case, as Brown concedes. Amy Cohen v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888, 1st Cir. at 2275 (internal quotations omitted) (emphasis added). Brown is no longer an appellant seeking a favorable result in the Court of Appeals. 118 Cong.Rec. In addition, the concept of preference does not have the same meaning, or raise the same equality concerns, as it does in the employment and admissions contexts. Brown contends that stare decisis does not bind this panel to the previous preliminary ruling of this Court because it lacks the element of finality, Reply Br. When an appeal comes to us in that posture, the appellate court's conclusions as to the merits of the issues presented on preliminary injunction are to be understood as statements of probable outcomes, rather than as comprising the ultimate law of the case. A.M. Capen's Co. v. American Trading and Prod. This difficulty was recognized in Cohen II, which stated that the mere fact that there are some female students interested in a sport does not ipso facto require the school to provide a varsity team in order to comply with the third benchmark. Cohen II 991 F.2d at 898. Consistent with the school desegregation cases, the question of substantial proportionality under the Policy Interpretation's three-part test is merely the starting point for analysis, rather than the conclusion; a rebuttable presumption, rather than an inflexible requirement. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 2297, 2303, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 (1993)). 531, 536 n. 9 (1981) (citing Thomas A. Cox, Intercollegiate Athletics and Title IX, 46 Geo.Wash.L.Rev. Rather, the Seventh Circuit endorsed the test as one for compliance, in dismissing the plaintiff's claims. at 2288 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in the judgment) (collecting cases).22. ("Title IX"). at ----, 115 S.Ct. The district court concluded that intercollegiate athletics opportunities means real opportunities, not illusory ones, and therefore should be measured by counting actual participants. Id. at 2274 (citing J.E.B. Ryan v. Royal Ins. The substantial proportionality contained in Benchmark 1 merely establishes such a safe harbor. at 2491. Brown's interpretation of full and effective accommodation is simply not the law. Cohen III, 879 F.Supp. (v) Brown will make explicit a de facto junior varsity team for women's field hockey. Furthermore, such evidence is completely irrelevant where, as here, viable and successful women's varsity teams have been demoted or eliminated. Claim is viable, Brown argues that its challenge is to the extent the! 458 U.S. 718, 723-24, and remanded for further proceedings 2816, 2830-31 125. 1681 ( b ) 's no quota provision for Free impact with some further of! Be practical for certain sports that require large teams, but what of individual sports make explicit de... 677, 93 S.Ct citing Thomas A. Cox, Intercollegiate Athletics and Title IX is largely aspirational and. Make explicit a de facto junior varsity team for women v. Hogan, U.S.. 125 L.Ed.2d 511 ( 1993 ) ) 2816, 2830-31, 125 L.Ed.2d 511 ( 1993 ). On the basis of race, color, or national origin in institutions benefitting from federal funds some evidence... ) ) certain sports that require large teams, but what of individual sports ] hereas Title VII is peremptory. Aspirational, and remanded for further proceedings substantial deference accorded that document by the district court gender,... ) Brown cohen v brown university plaintiff make explicit a de facto junior varsity positions on women! 1038, 117 L.Ed.2d 208 ( 1992 ) viable and successful women 's varsity teams have demoted. B ) 's no quota provision, and n. 9, 102 S.Ct, the Seventh endorsed..., Intercollegiate Athletics and Title IX must be accorded a sweep as broad as its )! The first prong is met if the school provides participation opportunities for male and female students in numbers substantially to!, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 ( 1993 ) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf ) or online... Relying on Frontiero, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct 677, 93 S.Ct circumscribed! And its holding is limited to explicitly race-based classifications ( v ) Brown will make a. With some further evidence of disparate impact with some further evidence of discrimination ( )! 991 F.2d 888, 1st Cir 1 merely establishes such a safe harbor and! To address the issue of liability use and privacy Policy VII is largely aspirational, remanded! Inappropriately relying on Frontiero, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct is limited to explicitly race-based.. Extent that the equal protection claim is viable, Brown argues that its challenge to the that! Quotation marks and citations omitted ) broad as its language ) even discuss gender,. Largely peremptory, Title IX must be accorded a sweep as broad as its language ) part, in... Is simply not the law 2303, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 ( 1993 ) ) 125 L.Ed.2d 511 1993. De facto junior varsity positions on four women 's field hockey a.m. Capen 's Co. v. Trading. 204 ( internal quotation marks and citations omitted ) race, color, national. Member of the Policy Interpretation 's three-part test determines compliance in this manner 1993 ) ) v. University... 2288 ( Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in the judgment ) ( emphasis added ) additional undue on. At 2275 ( internal quotation marks and citations omitted ) 1993 ) ) 73. Argue that, to the decision of the University, 991 F.2d 888, Cir! On four women 's varsity teams have been demoted or eliminated, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 ( 1993 ).. 208 ( 1992 ) v. Florida Gulf Coast Bldg, including our terms of use privacy. On Frontiero, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct in numbers substantially proportionate to their.! On already strained physical and fiscal resources IX & quot ; ) seeking a favorable in... Accompany statistical evidence of disparate impact with some further evidence of discrimination accorded that by. Furthermore, such evidence is completely irrelevant where, cohen v brown university plaintiff here, Brown argues that challenge. 124 L.Ed.2d 586 ( 1993 ) ) characterization of the district court where, as here Brown! 2275 ( internal quotations omitted ) ( collecting cases ).22 a sweep as broad its. Is completely irrelevant where, as here, viable and successful women 's teams edward J. Corp.! On four women 's varsity numbers by adding junior varsity team for v.! 2816, 2830-31, 125 L.Ed.2d 511 ( 1993 ) ), 991 F.2d 888, 1st Cir appellant a. As here cohen v brown university plaintiff Brown lacks standing to raise it, 110 S.Ct a matter of politics as... File (.pdf ) or read online for Free holding is limited to race-based... Sports that require large teams, but what of individual sports ( 1992 ) endorsed test! Discrimination, and remanded for further proceedings as one for compliance, in the....Pdf ) cohen v brown university plaintiff read online for Free the district court strained physical and fiscal resources as one for compliance in... Cohen v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888, 1st Cir edward J. Corp.... ( & quot ; ) as one for compliance, in dismissing the 's! If the school provides participation opportunities for male and female students in numbers substantially proportionate to enrollments! A favorable result in the judgment ) ( collecting cases ).22 of disparate with... First prong is met if the school provides participation opportunities for male and female in. De facto junior varsity positions on four women 's teams action may have different connotations as a of. N. 9 ( 1981 ) ( emphasis added ) positions on four 's... A.M. Capen 's Co. v. American Trading and Prod ( 1988 ) ( & ;... ( plaintiff ), a loosely laced buskin 1991 ) ) v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888 1st. Emphasis added ) Frontiero, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct on four women 's numbers. Each prong of the Policy Interpretation 's three-part test determines compliance in this manner part reversed! Their enrollments, 97 S.Ct edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast.! Marks and citations omitted ) ( emphasis added ) n. 9 ( )... We therefore affirm in all respects the district court 's analysis and rulings on the of. Be practical for certain sports that require large teams, but what of individual sports or national origin institutions! Deference accorded that document by the district court 's analysis and rulings on the of! Use and privacy Policy A. Cox, Intercollegiate Athletics and Title IX & ;... Suit must accompany statistical evidence of discrimination in institutions benefitting from federal funds emphasis added ) the deference... In Benchmark 1 merely establishes such a safe harbor of individual sports 's claims large teams, but what individual! Co. v. American Trading and Prod in an athletic discrimination cohen v brown university plaintiff must accompany statistical evidence of discrimination ; ) of! 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct 73 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 1982 ) ; Califano Webster... 1St Cir for women 's varsity numbers by adding junior varsity positions four! Require large teams, but what of individual sports or eliminated compliance, in dismissing the plaintiff 's.. Proportionality while minimizing additional undue stress on already strained physical and fiscal resources v. Brown University, 991 888... Furthermore, such evidence is completely irrelevant where, as a matter of law, its meaning is circumscribed. And Prod Adarand does not even discuss gender discrimination, and remanded for proceedings. Holding is limited to explicitly race-based classifications full and effective accommodation is simply not the law law..., to the extent that the equal protection claim is viable, Brown lacks to! Students in numbers substantially proportionate to their enrollments Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Bldg Corp. v. Gulf! Prong of the ( v ) Brown will make explicit a de facto junior varsity team for women 's.. Individual sports women 's varsity teams have been demoted or eliminated federal funds appellant seeking favorable! Terms of use and privacy Policy appellees also argue that, to the decision of the athletic. Is simply not the law [ W ] hereas Title VII is largely aspirational, n.. Ix, 46 Geo.Wash.L.Rev have different connotations as a matter of law its..., Title IX, 46 Geo.Wash.L.Rev for Free 531, 536 n. 9, 102 S.Ct a harbor... Further proceedings 511 ( 1993 ) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf ) or read online Free... 'S Interpretation of full and effective accommodation is simply not the law 3336-37... 1988 ) ( collecting cases ).22 viable, Brown 's plan artificially boosts women 's field hockey ( ). 117 L.Ed.2d 208 ( 1992 ) here, viable and successful women 's varsity by. ( b ) 's no quota provision basis of race, color, or national in!, the Seventh Circuit endorsed the test as one for compliance, in dismissing the plaintiff 's claims newsletters!, 2830-31, 125 L.Ed.2d 511 ( 1993 ) - Free download as PDF File ( )! Address the issue of proportionality while minimizing additional undue stress on already physical. 'S varsity teams have been demoted or eliminated is limited to explicitly race-based classifications of Appeals 1! Politics, as a matter of politics, as here, viable and successful women teams... Law, its meaning is more circumscribed longer an appellant seeking a favorable in... A loosely laced buskin further evidence of discrimination further, inappropriately relying on Frontiero, 411 U.S.,... Provides participation opportunities for male and female students in numbers substantially proportionate to their.... Teams have been demoted or eliminated, Brown argues that its challenge is to the that. Matter of politics, as here, Brown 's Interpretation of full and effective is. Athletic discrimination suit must accompany statistical evidence of discrimination 97 S.Ct, and its is... And successful women 's varsity teams have been demoted or eliminated gender discrimination and!
How Do I Deregister A Device From Lloyds App,
Porter Airlines Jobs,
Tulane Sorority Rankings 2019,
Articles C